I understand how CPG sells. I build AI that helps commercial teams make better decisions.

I'm Namratha, a Senior Product Manager with 7.5 years across CPG commercial: pricing and revenue growth management, trade promotion, sales execution and B2B commerce, in 22 countries. I build AI that improves commercial decisions, with a person approving every consequential call.

  • 7.5 yrs CPG commercial
  • 22 countries
  • 2024 Silver Stevie
  • $250M+ client-reported revenue uplift
  • IIM Indore MBA
Portrait of Namratha Rudrappa
The agent drafts. The rep approves. The AI never places the order.

Commercial first

Sales execution, shelf compliance, B2B commerce and pricing, across 22 countries.

AI with a brake

A Stevie-winning pricing agent that recommends and never acts alone.

Builder, by choice

A career break to ask "what did we never build, and why?", then FieldIQ, built solo.

My view: how AI can help CPG sell better

AI creates value when it improves the decision, not when it adds intelligence to a task that didn't need to be faster. Here's how I'd connect it across commercial execution, from plan to shelf.

My point of view in 90 seconds: AI from plan to shelfThree beliefs shape it. The insight has to reach the rep in the store, not stop at the dashboard. Autonomy should match the cost of an error, the reversibility of the decision, and the blast radius when it fails, so the agent recommends and a person decides. And what happened in the store should shape the next decision. Illustrative walkthrough with sample data.
Read the walkthrough
  1. Plan: AI drafts the demand baseline by account and SKU, and shows the drivers behind each number. The planner adjusts.
  2. Trade plan: AI scores each planned event on expected return and suggests moving budget from low-return events. The key account manager decides.
  3. Price and promotion: elasticity and promo history become a specific recommendation with its reasoning, and a person approves it.
  4. Agents watch the promotion: monitoring agents spot sell-through below plan and a competitor offer, a promo agent drafts an update, and the revenue manager signs off.
  5. Sales team briefed: the update lands in the rep's visit list as an Act Today task, and the draft order already includes the promotion requirement.
  6. Rep sells with AI: a shelf photo shows the gap, the gap becomes an order line, the rep edits and submits, and the next visit verifies the gap closed. Store results feed the next plan.

Reps start from a drafted order.

An AI agent drafts each order line with a reason and the numbers behind it. The rep edits and submits, so the decision stays with the person who knows the store.

FieldIQ Draft Order Agent →

The shelf reports on itself.

A shelf photo read by AI shows every gap against the contract, and each gap becomes a task for the visit. On the platform I owned, about 30% more outlets hit their target product mix.

Shelf compliance, 22 markets →

Pricing tools recommend a decision.

Revenue management teams told me they want help deciding what to do next. The product I led recommends price, promotion and mix changes, and a person approves each one. It delivered $250M+ in client-reported revenue uplift for a global food and beverage company.

Agentic RGM platform, 2024 Silver Stevie Award →

AI has to pass a test before it ships.

Contract terms, minimum order quantities and promotion windows break most AI demos. Every FieldIQ agent release has to clear a test suite that allows zero critical failures.

The release gate →

Simple rules still win some calls.

A rules-based visit score beat a vendor's ML route planner and took reps from 4 to 7 calls a day. Part of the job is knowing when AI is the wrong tool.

The ML pilot I shut down →

Try it: how deep should a promotion go?

RGM teams make this call every week. Deeper discounts sell more units, but every unit you'd have sold anyway is sold at the lower price too. Move the slider.

Temporary price reduction, as % off list price.

Store support

A display costs a fixed fee but lifts every unit of discount harder, so the best depth moves.

Past 7%, each extra point of discount mostly subsidizes units you would have sold anyway.

Incremental profit versus promotion depth for the selected store support, with the best depth and the current depth marked.-30k-20k-10k0k10k0%10%20%30%40%promotion depthincremental profit (index)Best: 7%
+51%Volume lift
66%of units you'd have sold anyway
+2,886Incremental profit vs. no promo (index)
+0.19Profit per 1 of trade spend
Price-to-pocket, per unit (list = 100)
List100Off-invoice−6Promotion−10Pocket84

Illustrative model with invented coefficients (baseline 1,000 units, unit cost 50, off-invoice 6, diminishing lift, a 20% post-promotion dip). It shows the shape of the trade-off. No client data or product output is used.

Hiring for a Senior PM or AI PM on a CPG commercial team?

I'm happy to walk you through FieldIQ live, or go deeper on any case study.